Lawzonline.com 
 
Home|Discussion Forum|Communities|Professional Search|Law Dictionary|Bare Acts|Law Schools|State Bare Acts|Free Judgement Search|Law quotes
Articles  |    Humor    |    Law Digest
 
 
Bare acts search

 
  
Bare acts > Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 > Order 8 Rule 10
 
  


 

10. Procedure when party falls to present written statement called for by Court.- Where any party from whom a written statement is required under rule 1 or rule 9 fails to present the same within the time permitted or fixed by the Court, as the case may be, the Court shall pronounce judgment against him, or make such order is relating to the suit as it thinks fit and on the pronouncement of such judgment a decree shall be drawn up.

HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS

Allahabad.- Add the following new Rules 11 and 12 :-

“11. Every party, whether original, added or substituted, who appears in any suit or other proceeding shall on or before the date fixed in the summons or notice served on him as the date of dearing, file in Court a proceeding stating his address for service, written in Hindi, in Devnagri script, and if he fails to do so he shall be liable to have his defence, if any, struck out and to be placed in the same position as if he had not defended. In this respect the Court may act suo motu or on the application of any party for an order to such effect, and the Court may make such order as it thinks just. [Amended 1971 LLT-V-18].

12. Rules 20,22,23,24 and 25 of Order VII shall apply, so far as may be, to addresses for service filed under the preceeding rule.” (1.6.1918).

Bombay.- Add the following as Rules 11 to 36:—

“11. Parties to file addresses.— (1) (a) - Every party, whether original, added or substituted, who appears in any suit or other proceeding, shall file in the court on or before the date fixed in the summons or notice served on him as date for his appearance or within such further time as may be allowed by the Court, a memorandum in writing stating the address at which he may be served.

(b) Registered address.— This address shall be called the “registered address” and it shall, subject to Rule 24 of Order VII read with Rule 12 of this Order, hold good in all proceedings in the suit and in appeals and also for a further period of six years from the date of the final decision for all purposes including those of execution

(c) Consequence of default in filing registered address.— if, after being registered to file the registered address within a specified time, he fails to do so, he shall be liable to have his defences, if any struck out and to be placed in the same position as if he had not defended. In this respect, the Court may act suo motu or on the application of any party for an order to such effect, and the Court may make such order as it thinks fit.

(2) When default may be condoned.— Where the Court has struck out the defences under sub-rule (1) and has adjourned the hearing of the suit or the proceeding and where the defendant or the opposite party at or before such hearing appears and assigns sufficient cause for his failure to file the registered address and also files registered address, he may, upon such terms as the Court directs as to costs or otherwise, be heard in answer to the suit or the proceeding as if the defences had not been struck out.

(3) When decree passed on default can be set aside.— Where the Court has struck out the defences under sub-rule (1) and has consequently passed a decree or order, the defendant or the opposite party, as the case may be, may apply to the Court by which the decree or order was passed for an order to set aside the decree or order, and if he files a registered address and satisfies the Court that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from filling the address, the Court shall make an order setting aside the decree or order as against him upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit and shall appoint a date for proceeding with the suit or proceeding:

Provided that were the decree or order is of such a nature that it cannot be set aside as against such defendant or opposite party only, it may be set aside as against all or any of the other defendants or the opposite parties.

12. Applicability of Rules 20 and 22 to 26 of Order VII.— Rules 20, 22,23,24,25 and 26 of Order VII shall apply, so far as they may be applicable, to registered addresses filed under the last preceeding rule.

Counter-claim

13. Defendant may set up counter-claim against the claims of the plaintiff in addition to set-off.— A defendant in a Suit, in addition to his right of pleading a set-off under Order VIII. Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, may set up by way of counter-claim against the claims of the plaintiff any right or claim in respect of a cause of action accruing to the defendant either before or after the filing of the suit, but before the defendant has delivered his defence and before the time limited for delivering his defence has expired, whether such counter-claim sounds in damages or not, and such counter-claim shall have the same effect as a cross-suit so as to enable the Court to pronounce a final judgment in the same Suit, both on the original and on the counter-claim, and the plaintiff (if so advised) shall be at liberty to file a written statement in answer to the counter-claim of the defendant within four weeks after service upon him or his pleader of a copy of the defendant’s counter-claim; and the Court or a Judge may, on the application of the plaintiff before trial, if in the opinion of the Court or Judge such counter-claim cannot be disposed of in the pending suit or ought not to be allowed, refuse permission to the defendant to avail himself thereof, and require him to file a separate suit in respect thereof.

14. Defendant setting up a counter-claim to specifically state so in the written statement.— Where any defendant seeks to rely upon any grounds as supporting a right of counter-claim, he shall in his written statement state specifically that he does so be way of counter-claim.

15. Where the counter-claim involves in addition to the plaintiff other persons also, the defendant to add further title to the title of the written statement and deliver copies of his written statement to such persons as are already parties to the suit,— Where a defendant by a written statement sets up any counter-claim, which raises questions between himself and the plaintiff along with any other persons, he shall add to the title of his written statement a further title similar to the title in a plaint, setting forth the names of all the persons who, if such counter-claim were to be enforced by a cross-suit, would be defendants to such cross-suit, and shall deliver copies of his written statement to such of them as are already parties to the suit within which he is required to deliver it to the plaintiff.

16. Service of summons when counter-claim is against persons who are not already parties to the suit.— Where any such person as is mentioned in the last precceding fule, is not already a party to the suit, he shall be summoned to appear by being served with a copy of the written statement and such service shall be regulated by the same rules as are contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with respect to the service of a writ of summons,
17. Appearance of persons other than defendants to the suit, when served with counter-claim.-— Any person not a defendant to the suit, who is served with a written statement and counter-claim as aforesaid, must appear therein as if he had been served with a writ of summons to appear in the suit.

18. Reply to counter-claim.— Any person named in a written statement as a party to a counter-claim thereby made, may deliver a reply within the time, within which he might deliver a written statement if it were a plaint.

19. Objection to counter-claim being allowed to be set up in the suit.— Where a defendant sets up a counter-claim, if the plaintiff or any other person named in the manner aforesaid as party to such counter-claim, contends that the claim thereby raised ought not to be disposed of by way of counter-claim but in an independent suit, he may, at any time before reply, apply to the Court of a Judge for an order that such counter-claim may be excluded, and the Court, or a Judge may, on the hearing of such application, make such order as shall be just.

20. Counter-claim may be proceeded with, even if suit be stayed, discontinued or dismissed.— If in any case in which the defendant sets up a counter-claim, the suit of the plaintiff is stayed, discontinued or dismissed, the counter-claim may nevertheless be proceeded with.
21. On default of reply to counter-claim, the counter-claim may be set down for judgment.— If the defendant to the counter-claim makes default in putting in a reply to the counter-claim, the defendant in the suit who is the plaintiff to the counter-claim may, in such cases get the suit set down for judgment on the counter-claim, and such judgment shall be given as the Court shall consider him to be entitled to.

22. Judgment when set-off or counter-claim is established.— Where in any suit a set-off or counter-claim is established as a defence against the plaintiff’s claim, the Court or a Judge may, if the balance is in favour of the defendant, give judgment for the defendant for such balance, or may otherwise adjudge to the defendant such relief as he may be entitled upon the merits of the case.(1.11.1966).

Third Party Procedure

23. Third Party Notice.— Where in a suit a defendant claims against any person not already a party to the suit (hereinafter called the third party)—

(a) that he is entitled to contribution or indemnity, or

(b) that he is entitled to any relief or remedy relating to or connected with the subject-matter of the suit and substantially the same as some relief or remedy claimed by the plaintiff, or

(c) that any question or issue relating to or connected with subject-matter of the Suit IS substantially the same as some question or issue arising between the plaintiff and the defendant and should properly be determined not only as between the plaintiff and the defendant but as between the plaintiff and the defendant and the Third Party or between any or either of them, he may apply to the Court for leave to issue a notice (hereinafter called the “Third Party Notice”) to that effect. The application shall be made by affidavit, stating the nature of the claim made by the defendant and the facts on which proposed. Third Party Notice is based and may be made expert. The application shall be made with in four weeks from the service of the summons upon defendant.

24. Form and Service of Notice.— (1) Third Party Notice shall state the nature of the claim made by the plaintiff against the defendant and the nature and grounds of the claim made by the defendant against the Third party or the nature and extent of any relief or remedy claimed by him against Third Party or the nature of the question or issue sought to be determined and shall be sealed with the seal of the Court. It shall be served on the Third Party according to the rules relating to service of summons and shall, unless otherwise ordered, be served within two weeks from the date of the order granting leave to issue the Third Party Notice, A copy of the plaint and copy of the affidavit of the defendant in support of the Third Party Notice shall be served on the Third Party along with the Third Party Notice.

(2) A copy of the Third Party Notice and of the affidavit of the defendant in support of the Third Party Notice shall be furnished to all parties to the suit within two weeks from the date of the order granting leave to issue the Third Party Notice.

25. Effect of Service of Notice.— The Third Party shall, as from the time of the service upon him of the Notice, be a party to the suit with the same rights in respect of his defence against any claim made against him and otherwise as if he had been duly sued in the ordinary way by the defendant.

26. Third Party to enter appearance or Vakalatnama.— If the Third Party desired to dispute the plaintiff’s claim in the suit as against the defendant on whose behalf the Notice has been issued or his own liability to the defendant, the Third Party shall enter an appearance in person or a Vakalatnama in the suit within two weeks from the service of the Notice:-

Provided that a person so served and failing to appear within the said period of two weeks may apply to the Court for leave to appear and such leave may be given on such terms, if any, as the Court may think fit.

27. Consequence of Failure to enter Appearance of Vakalatnama.— If the Third Party does not enter an appearance in person or a Vakalatnama he shall be deemed to admit the claim stated in the Third Party Notice and shall be bound by any judgment or decision in the suit, whether by consent or otherwise. in so far as it is relevant to any claim, question or issue stated in the Notice.

28. Decree when Third Party makes Default in Appearance or Vakalatnama.— Where the Third Party makes default in entering an appearance in person or a Vakalatnama in the suit

(1) in cases where the suit is tried and results in favour of the plaintiff, the court which tries the suit may, at or after the trial, pass such decree in favour of the defendant against the Third Party as the nature of the case may require:

Provided that, execution thereof shall not issue without the leave of the Court until the decree against the defendant has been satisfied, and

(2) in cases where the suit is decided in plaintiff’s favour, otherwise than by trial, the Court max’, at any time after the decree against the defendant has been satisfied, on the application of the defendant pass such decree in favour of the defendant against the Third Party as the nature of the case may require.
29. Third Party to file Affidavit in Reply.— If the Third Party enters an appearance in person or a Vakalatnama he shall file within two weeks thereafter an affidavit in reply to the affidavit of the defendant in support of the Third Party Notice, and his case, if any, in respect of the plaint.

30. Appearance or Vakalatnama of Third Party Directions to be given.— (1) Where the Third party enters an appearance in person for a Vakalatnama and files his affidavit as required by the last preceding rule, and the suit appears on board for directions before the Court it may -

(a) order any claim, question or issue stated in the Third Party Notice to be tried in such manner, before, at or after the trial of the suit, as the Court may think fit and may, in that event, give the Third Party leave to defend the suit either along or jointly with any defendant, upon such terms as he may think just, or to appear at the trial and take such part therein as he may think and just and generally may make such orders and give such directions as may appear proper for having the questions and the rights and liabilities of the parties most conveniently determined and enforced and as to the extent to which the Third Party shall be bound or made liable by any decree in the suit, or

(b) dismiss the Third Party Notice.

(2) Any order made or direction given under this rule may be varied or rescinded by the Court at any time before the disposal of the suit.

31. Defendant to apply for directions in certain cases.— Where for any reason it is not possible for the Court to give direction on the Third Party Notice at the time when the suit appears on the Board for directions, the defendant issuing the Third Party Notice shall, within two weeks, after the filing of the affidavit in reply by the Third Party apply for directions. Upon the hearing of such applications, the Court may pass such orders and give such directions as are mentioned in the last preceding rule.

32. Costs.— The Court may decide all questions of costs as between a Third Party and the other parties to the suit, and may order any one or more to pay the costs of any other, or others or give such directions to costs
as the justice of the case may requires

33. Setting aside Third Party proceedings.— Proceedings on a Third Party Notice may, at any stage of the proceedings, be set aside by the Court.

34. Right of the Third Party and of each successive Third Party to apply for Third Party Notice against other persons.— (1) Where the Third Party makes against any person not already a party to the suit (to be called ‘the second Third Party’) such a claim as is mentioned in Rule 23 he may by leave of the Court issue a Third Party Notice to that effect.

(2) Where the second ‘Third Party’ in his turn makes such a claim as is mentioned in Rule 23 against any person not already a party to the suit (to be called ‘the Third Party’) or where each successive Third Party in his turn makes such a claim against any person not already a Party to the suit, such second ‘Third Party’ or any successive Third Party may, by leave of the Court issue a Third Party Notice to that effect.

(3) The provisions contained in the preceding rules as to Third Party Procedure shall, with any necessary modification apply to all cases where Third Party Notices have been issued, whether at the instance of the Third 4 Party or any successive Third Party.

35. Right of defendant to issue Third Party Notice against co-defendant.— (1) Where a defendant makes against a co-defendant such a claim as is mentioned in Rule 23 he may, without leave of the Court, issue and serve on such co-defendant within six weeks from the service of the summons upon him (the defendant making the claim) a notice stating the nature and ground of such claim and shall at the same time file an affidavit in support
of such claim and furnish copies thereof to all parties in the suit.

(2) The provisions contained in the preceding rules regarding Third Party Procedure shall, with necessary modification, apply to cases where a defendant has issued such notice against a co-defendant, but nothing herein contained shall prejudice the rights of the plaintiff against any defendant in the suit.


36. Third Party proceeding in a counter-claim.— Where in any Suit a counter-claim is made by a defendant, the provisions contained in the preceding rules regarding Third Party Procedure shall, with any necessary modifications, apply in relation to the counter-claim as if the subject-matter of the counter-claim were the subject-matter of the suit, and as if the person making the counter-claim were the plaintiff and the person against whom it is made a defendant.” (31.12.1987).

Delhi and Himachal Pradesh.- Same as in Punjab.

Gujarat.- Add the following new Rules 11 and 12:-

“11. Parties in file addresses.— Every party, whether original, added or substituted, who appears in any suit or other proceeding shall, on or before the date fixed in the summons or notice served on him as the date of hearing, file in Court a memorandum in writing stating his address for service, and if he fails to do so, he shall be liable to have his defence if any, struck out and to be placed in the same position as if he had not defended. In this respect the Court may act sun motu or on the application of any party for an order to such effect, and the Court may make such order as it thinks fit. The address so given shall hold good throughout the interlocutory proceedings and appeals and also for a further period of two years from the date of final decision and for all purposes including those of execution:

Provided that this rule shall not apply to a defendant who has not filed a written statement but who is examined by the Court under Section 7 of the Dekkhan Agriculturiest’ Relief Act, 1879, or otherwise, or in any case where the Court permits the address for service to be given by a party on a date later than that specified in this rule.

12. Applicability of Rules 20, 22, 24 and 25 of Order VII to addresses for service.— Rule 20, 22, 24 and 25 of Order VII shall apply, so far as may be, to addresses for service filed under the last preceding rule.” (1.11.1966).

Madhya Pradesh.- (Notification No. 3409; 29.6.1943) — Add the following Rules 11 to 13:

“11. Registered address.— Every defendant in a suit or opposite party in any proceedings shall, on the first day of his appearance in Court, file a memorandum giving an address for service on him of any subsequent process. The address shall be within the local limits of the Civil District in which the suit or petition is fixed or, if an address within the local limits of such Civil District cannot conveniently be given, within the local limits of the Civil District in which the party ordinarily resides.

This address shall be called the “registered address” and it shall hold good throughout interlocutory proceedings and appeals and also for a further period of two years from the date of final decision and for all purposes including those of execution,

12. Consequences of non-filing of registered address.— (1) If the defendant or the opposite party fails to file a registered address as required by Rule 11, he shall be liable, at the discretion of the Court, to have his defence struck out and to be placed in the position as if he had made no defence.

An order under this rule may be passed by the Court sun motu or on the application of any party.

(2) Where the Court has struck out the defence under sub-rule (1) and has adjourned the hearing of the suit or the proceedings and where the defendant or the opposite party at or before such hearing appears and assigns sufficient cause for his failure to file the registered address he may upon such terms as the Court directs as to costs or otherwise be heard in answer to the suit or the proceedings as if the defence had not been struck out.

(3) Where the Court has struck out the defence under sub-rule (1) and has consequently passed a decree or order, the defendant or the opposite party, as the case may be, may apply to the Court by which the decree or order was passed for an order to set aside the decree or order; and if he files a registered address and satisfies the Court that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from filing the address, the Court shall make an order setting aside the decree or order as against him upon such terms as to Costs or otherwise as it thinks fit, and shall appoint a day for proceeding with the suit or proceeding:

Provided that where the decree is of such a nature that it cannot be set aside as against such defendant or opposite party only it may be set aside as against all or any of the other defendants or opposite parties.

13. Rules 20, 22 and 23 of Order VII shall apply, so far as may he, to addresses for service filed under Rule 11,” (16.9.1960).

Orissa.- Omit 11 and 12 of Order Villas added by Orissa Amendment (14.5.1984).

Patna.- Add the following new Rules 11 and 12:—

“11. Every party, whether original, added or substituted, who appears in any suit or other proceedings shall at the time of entering appearance to the summons, notice or other process served on him, file in Court a statement stating his address for service and if he fails to do so, he shall be liable to have his defence, if any, struck out and to be placed in the same position as if he had not defended. In this respect the Court may act suo motu or on the application of any party for an order to such effect and the Court may make such order as it thinks just.

12. Rules 20 and 22 Order VII shall apply; so far as may be to addresses for service filed under the preceding rule.”

Punjab.- Add the following as new Rules 11 and 12:

”11. Every party, whether original, added or substituted, who appears in any suit or other proceeding, shall on or before the date fixed in the summons, notice or other process served on him as the date of hearing, file in court a proceeding stating his address for service, and, if he fails to do so, he shall be liable to have his defence, if any, stfuck out and to be placed in the same position as if he had not defended. In this respect the Court may act suo motu or on the application of any party for an order to such effect, and the Court may made such order as it thinks just.”

12. Rules 20, 22,23,24 and 25 of Order VII shall apply, so far as may be, to addresses for service filed under the proceeding rule.” (24.11.1927).

Rajasthan.- Add the following new Rules 11 and 12 :—

“11. (1) Same as Punjab Rule 11 with the following modifications:

(i) for “summons, notice or other process” read “summons or notice”;

(ii) after the words “file in Court” for “a proceeding” substitute “a memorandum”.

(2) Same as sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 of Madhya Pradesh, only substituting “good cause” for “sufficient cause”.

(3) Same as sub-rule (3) of Rule 12 of Madhya Pradesh, only inserting after “decree” the words “or order”.

12. Rules 19(2), 20,23,24, and 25 of Order VII shall apply, so far as may be addresses for service filed under the preceding rule.” (8.7.1954).


Order VIII-A

Andhra Pradesh.- Same as that of Madras.

Karnataka.- After Order VIII insert the following:—

Order VIII-A : Third Party Procedure

1. (1) Where in respect of the claim made against him in the suit, a defendant claims to be entitled to contribution from or indemnity against any person not already party to the suit (hereinafter called the Third Party) he may by leave of Court, issue a notice (hereinafter called the Third Party Notice) to that effect, sealed with the seal of the Court.

(2) An application for leave to issue such notice shall be filed along with the written statement of the said defendant and be accompanied by a draft of the notice sought to be issued. The notice shall state the nature and grounds of the claim and when the draft of the same is approved by Court with or without corrections, it shall be served on the third party together with a copy of the plaint and a copy of the said defendant’s written statement in the manner prescribed for the service of summons.

2. (1) If on being served with such notice the third party does not enter appearance on or before the date fixed therein for his appearance, he shall be deemed to admit the validity of the decree that may be passed against the defendant, on whose behalf the notice was issued, whether upon contest or consent or otherwise, and to admit his own liability to contnoute or indemnity, as the case may be, to the extent claimed in the third party notice:

Provided that a person so served and failing to appear may, at any time before the disposal of the suit, apply to Court for leave to appear and the Court may grant such leave upon such terms, if any, as it may think fit to impose:

(2) Where the third party does not enter appearance in the suit and the suit is decreed upon contest or consent or otherwise against the defendant on whose behalf the notice was issued, the Court may in the said decree make such directions as to contribution or indemnity as the case may be, against the third party and in favour of the said defendant as the circumstances of the case may require:

Provided that the execution thereof shall not issue against the third party without the leave of the Court until after satisfaction by such defendant of the decree against him.

3. If the third party desires to dispute either the claim made against him in the third party notice or the plaintiff’s claim in the suit or both, he shall enter appearance in the suit on or before the date fixed there for in the notice.

4. When the third party enters appearance under Rule 3 or upon leave being granted under the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 he shall apply to Court for directions as to further proceedings to be taken on the notice setting out his case or pleas in respect of the same, Notice thereof shall be given both to the defendant on whose behalf the third party notice was issued as well to the plaintiff fixing an early date for its hearing.

5. (1) On hearing of such application — (a) if the Court is of the opinion either that the claim made in the third party notice is prima facie not warranted or that it s not so intimately connected with the plaintiff’s claim in the suit as to render its being conveniently tried along with the plaintiff’s claim in the suit, or that its trial in the suit will unduly prolong or hamper the trial of the suit, the Court may dismiss the proceedings on the third party notice:

(b) if the Court is satisfied that there is a question to he tried as to the liability of the third party to make the contribution or pay the indemnity claimed, in whole or in part, and that if is just and convenient to try the same in the suit itself, the Court may order the question of such liability as between the third party and the defendant giving notice, to be tried in such manner as it may direct and may by the said order also give liberty to the third party to defend the suit itself upon such terms as may be just.

(2) When the Court proceeds under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) it shall also give such directions as may be necessary for the delivery of pleadings, production of documents or the making of further appropriate proceeding in the suit.

(3) If upon trial a decree comes to be passed either on contest or consent or otherwise against the defendant on whose behalf notice was given, the Court shall in such decree make such direction as to contribution or indemnity, as the case may be, against the third party and in favour of the said defendant as the circumstances of the case may require, and also as to whether execution in respect of such direction against the third party shall or shall not be conditional upon the defendant satisfying the decree against him.

(4) The Court, while making such decrees may, decide all questions of costs as between the third party and other parties and may order any one or more to pay the costs of any other or others and give such directions as to costs as the justice of the case may require.

6. (1) Where the Court dismisses the proceedings on a third party notice under clause (a) of sub-rule (5), the claim made in the third party notice shall be deemed to have been left undecided, and the defendant on whose behalf notice was issued will be at liberty to take such other independent proceeding in respect thereof as may be open to him, as if no such notice had been issued by him.

(2) Where the Court decides to proceed under clause (b)of sub-rule (1) of Rule 5, the third party shall, as from the date on which the third party notice was served on him be a party to the suit and shall have -

(a) the same rights as respects the claims made against him by or the decree passed against him in favour of the defendant on whose behalf the notice was issued, as if he had been sued in the ordinary way by the said defendant; and

(b) where he is given the liberty to defend the suit itself, the same rights as respects his defence in the suit and the decree passed therein as if he had been sued in the ordinary way by the plaintiff in the suit.

(3) On the making of an order under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 5, the cause title of the suit shall be amended by inserting the name of the third party in the array of defendants, with the addition in brackets after his name the words ‘Third Party on the notice of the defendant served on.”


KERALA.- Same as Madras (9.6.1959).

MADRAS, PONDICHERRY.- After Order VIII insert the following as Order VIII-A, namely:

Order VIII-A: Third party Procedure

1. Third party notice.— Where a defendant claims to he entitled to contribution from or indemnity against any person not already a party to the suit (hereinafter called a third party notice) to that effect, sealed with the seal of the Court. the notice shall state the nature and grounds of the claim. Such notice shall be filed into Court with a copy of the plaint and shall be served on the third party according to the rules relating to the service of summons.

2. Effect of notice.— The third party shall, as from the time of the service upon him of the notice, be deemed to be a party to the action with the same rights in respect of his defence against any claim made against him and otherwise as if he had been duly sued in the ordinary way by the defendant.

3. Default by third party.— If the third party desires to dispute the plaintiff’s claim in the suit as against the defendant on whose behalf the notice has been given, or his own liability to the defendant, the third party may enter appearance in the suit on or before the date fixed for his appearance in the notice. If he does not enter appearance he shall be deemed to admit the validity of the decree that may be obtained against such defendant, whether by consent or otherwise and his own liability to contribute or indemnity, as the case may be. to the extent claimed in the third party notice:

Provided always that a person so served and failing to appear may apply to the Court for leave to appear, and such leave maybe given upon such terms, if any, as the Court shall think fit.

4. Procedure on default.—Where the third party does not enter appearance in the suit and the suit is decreed by consent or otherwise in favour of the plaintiff, the Court may pass such decree as the nature of the case may require, against the third party and in favour of the defendant on whose behalf notice was issued:

Provided that execution thereof shall not be issued without leave of the Court until after satisfaction by such defendant of the decree against him.

5. Third party directions.— If the third party enters appearance the defendant on whose behalf notice was issued may apply to the Court for directions; and the Court may, if satisfied that there is a question to be tried as to the liability of the third party to make the contribution or pay the indemnity claimed, in whole or in part. order the question of such liability, as between the third party and the defendant giving the notice to be tried in such manner, at or after the trial of the suit, as the Court may direct; and if not so satisfied, may pass such decree or order as the nature of the case may require.

6. Leave to defend.— The Court may upon the hearing of the application mentioned in Rule 5. give the third party liberty to defend the suit upon such terms as may be just, or to appear at the trial and take such part therein as may be just, and generally may order such proceedings to be taken, documents to be delivered or amendments to be made, and give such directions as appear proper for the most convenient determination of the question or questions in issue, and as to the mode and extent in or to which the third party shall be bound or made liable by the decree in the suit.

7. Costs.— The Court may decide all questions of costs as between the third party and the other parties to the suit, and may order any one or more to pay the costs of any other or others, or give such direction as to costs as the justice of the case may require.

8. Questions between co-defendants.— Where a defendant claims to be entitled to contribution from or indemnity against any other defendant to the suit, a notice may be issued and the same procedure shall be adopted for the determination of such questions between the defendants as would be issued and taken, if such last mentioned defendant were third party; but nothing herein contained shall prejudice the right of the plaintiff against any defendant in the suit.

9. Further parties.— Where any person served with a third party notice by a defendant under these rules claims to be entitled to contribution from or indemnity against any person not already a party to the suit, he may, by leave of the Court, issue a third party notice to that effect, and the preceding rules as to the third party procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to every notice so issued and the expressions “third party notice” and “third party” in these rules shall apply to and include every notice so issued and every person served with such notice respectively. ”Act 26 of 1968, Section 3 and Schedule, Part II (w.e.f. 5.9.1968).

 

 

 

 

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

 

Quick Links     
      
Family LawsInsurance LawsEnvironmental lawTax LawFDI 
Company LawTelecommunication LawLabour LawsCentral RulesRBI 
Business & Commercial LawsConsumer lawsCorporate lawsCriminal lawsSEBI 
Intellectual Property lawMedia & Press lawsPharma & Medical lawsProperty lawFEMA 
Debt Recovery LawsAmendmentsProfessional lawBanking LawsLegal Links 
      
      
 
 
 
 
 

 
   
 

 

 

Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

Copyright @2010