| Register
Home | Discussion Forum | Communities | Professional Search | Law Dictionary | Bare Acts | Law Schools | State Bare Acts | Free Judgement Search | Law quotes
Articles  |    Humor    |    Law Digest
Bare acts search
Bare acts > Indian Evidence Act, 1872 > Section 33

33. Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, the truth of facts therein stated.- Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding or before any person authorized by law to take it, is relevant for the purpose of proving, in a subsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage of the same judicial proceeding, the truth of the facts which it states, when the witness is dead or cannot be found, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is kept out of the way by the adverse party, or if his presence cannot be obtained without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable :


that the proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest;

that the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine;

that the questions in issue were substantially the same in the first as in the second proceeding.

Explanation.—A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused within the meaning of this section.



A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z


Quick Links          
Family Laws Insurance Laws Environmental law Tax Law FDI  
Company Law Telecommunication Law Labour Laws Central sections RBI  
Business & Commercial Laws Consumer laws Corporate laws Criminal laws SEBI  
Intellectual Property law Media & Press laws Pharma & Medical laws Property law FEMA  
Debt Recovery Laws Amendments Professional law Banking Laws Legal Links  
Partner Site India No 1 Business Directory and Classified Portal Your Online Library


Lawzonline search:


Privacy PolicyDisclaimer | Link partners

Copyright @2010