Lawzonline.com 
 
Home|Discussion Forum|Communities|Professional Search|Law Dictionary|Bare Acts|Law Schools|State Bare Acts|Free Judgement Search|Law quotes
Articles  |    Humor    |    Law Digest
 
 
Bare acts search

 
  
Bare acts > Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 > Section 111
 
  


 

111. STAY OF PROCEEDINGS WHERE THE VALIDITY OF REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK IS QUESTIONED ETC. – (1) An application for rectification of the register made to a High Court under section 46, sub section (4) of sec. 47 or Sec. 56 shall be such from and shall contain such particulars as may be prescribed.

(2) Every such application shall be heard by a single Judge of the High Court:

Provided that any such Judge may, if he thinks fit, refer the application at any stage of the proceedings for decision to a Bench of that High Court:

(a) The defendant pleads’s the registration of the plaintiff’s trade mark is invalid; or

(b) The defendant raises a defence under Cl. (d) of sub-section (1) of Sec. 30 and the plaintiff pleads the invalidity of the registration of the defendant’s trade mark,

The Court trying the suit (hereinafter referred to as the Court), shall, -

(i) If any proceedings for rectification of the register in relation to the plaintiffs or defendant’s trade mark are pending before the Registrar or the High Court, stay the suit pending the final disposal of such proceedings;

(ii) If no such proceedings are pending and the Court is satisfied that the plea regarding the invalidity of the registration of the plaintiff s or defendant’s trade mark is prima facie tenable, raise an issue regarding the same and adjourn the case for a period of three months from the date of the framing of the issue in order to enable the party concerned to apply to the High Court for rectification of the register.

(2) If the party concerned proves to the Court that he has made any such application as is referred to in Cl. (b) (ii) of sub-section (1) within the time specified therein or within such extended time as the Court may for sufficient cause allow, the trial of the suit shall stand stayed until the final disposal of the rectification proceedings.

(3) If no such application as aforesaid has been made within the time so specified or within such extended time as the Court may allow, the issue as to the validity of the registration of the trade mark concerned shall be deemed to have been abandoned and the Court shall proceed with the suit in regard to the other issues in the case.

(4) The final order made in any rectification proceedings referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be binding upon the parties and the Court shall dispose of the suit conformably to such order in so far as it relates to the issue as to validity of the registration of the trade mark.

(5) The stay of a suit for the infringement of a trade mark under this section shall not preclude the Court making any interlocutory order (including any order granting an injunction, directing accounts to be kept, appointing a Receiver or attaching any property), during the period of the stay of the suit.

 

 

 

 

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

 

 

Quick Links     
      
Family LawsInsurance LawsEnvironmental lawTax LawFDI 
Company LawTelecommunication LawLabour LawsCentral RulesRBI 
Business & Commercial LawsConsumer lawsCorporate lawsCriminal lawsSEBI 
Intellectual Property lawMedia & Press lawsPharma & Medical lawsProperty lawFEMA 
Debt Recovery LawsAmendmentsProfessional lawBanking LawsLegal Links 
      
      
 
 
 
 
 

 
   
 

 

 

Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

Copyright @2010